• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Domain Industry & Internet News

Domain Industry & Internet News

Domain Name Industry News

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submit News
  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
You are here: Home / ccTLDs / AuDA Consultation on Direct Registrations and Other Anti-Domainer Policies

AuDA Consultation on Direct Registrations and Other Anti-Domainer Policies

March 26, 2019 by Michele Neylon

At present the Australian ccTLD only allows registrations under extensions such as com.au, net.au, org.au etc., The registry’s rules make it quite hard, though not impossible for non-Australians to register domain names. However if you hold a trademark that is valid in Australia you can get a domain.

In common with other country codes they’ve been examining the possibility of opening up direct registrations, so you’d end up with yourcompany.au instead of yourcompany.com.au, or at least you’d have the option.

The registry, its board and policy review panel have been exploring the options around offering direct registrations for the last couple of years and to that end they conducted some surveys and reviews. (You can read all the background material they’ve released here.)

So far so good. Other ccTLD registries have gone down this road in the past. Nominet did it, but upset a lot of domainers in the process, whereas co.nz managed to pull it off without generating that much controversy.

After several years of this being in the pipeline they’re now conducting one final round of consultation before moving forward with the introduction of direct registrations.

However the final report that they’re looking for input on goes much further than simply giving a green light to direct registrations. (You can download a copy here)

There are quite a few other policy recommendations in there that will impact registrants (and potential registrants) of .au domain names. While a fundamental change to registration policy might have involved updating other policies the report goes much much further:

  • Non-Australian businesses could be restricted to exact match registrations if using a trademark. The current policy does not impose these kind of restrictions. Once you have a trademark covering Australia you have the same rights to register as anyone else.
  • “Stricter controls be put in place to ensure that domain names are not being registered solely for the purpose of resale or warehousing (ie. holding a large collection of domain licences for future resale when they become more valuable).” – while many ccTLDs have clauses in their policies to “warehousing” this goes much further and I’d suspect too far. It’s very easy for this to kill off the aftermarket if not handled sanely
  • Removal of “monetisation” as a valid purpose for registering a domain (yeah, that’s a pretty explicit attack on a business model)

Specifically around the direct registrations:

  • Priority allocation for 6 months. So if you have company.com.au you will be able to get company.au before anyone else for a 6 month period
  • Conflict resolution for clashes ie. if there’s a domain under .com.au and .org.au. While I understand the rationale other ccTLDs gave priority to one extension over others and simplified things.
  • Rights for the priority allocation date back to 4 February 2018, as this is when the consultation opened

The consultation is open until April 10th and submissions can be made via email or in writing. Auda will not be considering anonymous submissions and also state that they will publish all submissions received unless they are explicitly marked as “confidential”.

Full details of the consultation here.

Filed Under: ccTLDs Tagged With: auda, Australia, ccTLDs

About Michele Neylon

Michele is founder and managing director of Irish domain registrar and hosting company Blacknight. Michele has been deeply involved in domain and internet policy discussions for more than a decade.
He also co-hosts the Technology.ie podcast.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

ICANN Logo

ICANN Announces Locations for two Future Meetings

DNS Belgium logo

DNS Belgium Opens Call for Registrar Forum

ICANN Logo

ICANN 82 Seattle Full Schedule Available

RIPE Chair and Vice Chair Nominations Open

ICANN Logo

Want to Serve on an ICANN Board or Council?

Recent Comments

  • Jim Davies Threatening Legal Action Against Nominet on Nominet Elections Candidates Announced
  • Paul on Nominet Elections Candidates Announced
  • Snail Mucin on Does the Epik Sale Signal the end of the Saga or just a new Chapter?
  • John Berryhill on Does the Epik Sale Signal the end of the Saga or just a new Chapter?
  • ICANN Gets First Female CEO on Centralnic Head Honcho Announces Immediate Retirement

Categories

Blogroll

  • Alex Bligh
  • Circle ID
  • Domain Incite
  • Domain Name News
  • Domain Name Wire
  • Jason Thompson

Blogs

  • Domain Gang
  • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Jim Davies Threatening Legal Action Against Nominet on Nominet Elections Candidates Announced
  • Paul on Nominet Elections Candidates Announced
  • Snail Mucin on Does the Epik Sale Signal the end of the Saga or just a new Chapter?
  • John Berryhill on Does the Epik Sale Signal the end of the Saga or just a new Chapter?
  • ICANN Gets First Female CEO on Centralnic Head Honcho Announces Immediate Retirement

Categories

Blogroll

  • Alex Bligh
  • Circle ID
  • Domain Incite
  • Domain Name News
  • Domain Name Wire
  • Jason Thompson
  • Nigel Roberts

Blogs

  • Domain Gang
  • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Copyright © 2025 InternetNews.me