• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Domain Industry & Internet News

Domain Industry & Internet News

Domain Name Industry News

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submit News
  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise Hosting & Domain Industry Jobs
You are here: Home / udrp / Expletive Renders UDRP Complaint Void

Expletive Renders UDRP Complaint Void

May 19, 2014 by Michele Neylon

Calvin Klein are a well known fashion company. The “CK” and Calvin Klein logos are well known.

So you’d almost expect a domain dispute involving a domain name with the term “Calvin Klein” in it to be a “slam dunk”.

However UDRPs and other domain disputes are not quite that predictable as they rely on several factors:

  • the rules
  • trademark law
  • precedent
  • the panelist(s)

A recent decision involved the domain name: fuckcalvinklein.com

Yes, that’s “f**k Calvin Klein”

You can read the full decision here, but the key bit is the actual decision which states (emphasis added):

Respondent asserts that the <fuckcalvinklein.com> domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainant’s CALVIN KLEIN mark because the message conveyed by the vulgarity “fuck” in the disputed domain name makes it clear that there is no association with Complainant.

The panelists also made reference to previous “sucks” related decisions:

(finding that the addition of the term “sucks” to the complainant’s KB HOME mark in the <kbhomesucks.com> domain name did not make the domain name confusingly similar to the mark because a reasonable person would not conclude that a person who registers a domain name containing the term “sucks” has any relation to the owner of the mark); see also Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Parisi, D2000-1015 (WIPO Jan. 26, 2001) (finding that common sense and a reading of the plain language of the Policy support the view that a domain name combining a trademark with the word “sucks” or other language clearly indicates that the domain name is not affiliated with the trademark owner and, therefore, <lockheedmartinsucks.com> and <lockheedsucks.com> cannot be considered confusingly similar to LOCKHEED MARTIN).

Of course I wouldn’t recommend testing out this .. just because a couple of panelists have viewed the addition of “sucks” to a domain name as being acceptable does not mean that all panelists would agree.

And of course in this case would a “normal” internet user confuse the domain name with an official site run by Calvin Klein? Adding a nice big expletive to the domain name appears to solve that:

..because the term “fuck” provides an indication that Respondent is not affiliated with Complainant and the Internet user entering the domain name could not possibly expect Complainant to be, or desire to be, affiliated with such a domain name

So what will happen when we see new extensions like .wtf and .sucks being rolled out? Will panelists still rely solely on the part of the domain to the left of the dot or will see them taking into consideration both sides of the dot?

Filed Under: udrp Tagged With: Calvin Klein, Domain name, Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, World Intellectual Property Organization

About Michele Neylon

Michele is founder and managing director of Irish domain registrar and hosting company Blacknight. Michele has been deeply involved in domain and internet policy discussions for more than a decade.
He also co-hosts the Technology.ie podcast.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

ICANN’s Cancún Meeting Was Almost Normal

Middle East DNS Forum to be Held in Istanbul

Gandi Merges with TWS to Form “Your.Online”

Anguilla Offline due to Fibre Issue

IGF 2023 to be Held in Kyoto, Japan

Recent Comments

  • ICANN Gets First Female CEO on Centralnic Head Honcho Announces Immediate Retirement
  • Kieren McCarthy Elected to Nominet Board on Nominet Election Candidates 2022 Finally Announced
  • Michele Neylon on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • Gavin Brown on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • ICANN Heading to Hamburg (ICANN78) and Los Angeles (GDD) Plus Training For African Registries - Goldstein Report on ICANN Announces GDD Summit Dates & Location

Categories

Blogroll

  • Alex Bligh
  • Circle ID
  • Domain Incite
  • Domain Name News
  • Domain Name Wire
  • Jason Thompson

Blogs

  • Domain Gang
  • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Archives

Recent Comments

  • ICANN Gets First Female CEO on Centralnic Head Honcho Announces Immediate Retirement
  • Kieren McCarthy Elected to Nominet Board on Nominet Election Candidates 2022 Finally Announced
  • Michele Neylon on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • Gavin Brown on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • ICANN Heading to Hamburg (ICANN78) and Los Angeles (GDD) Plus Training For African Registries - Goldstein Report on ICANN Announces GDD Summit Dates & Location

Categories

Blogroll

  • Alex Bligh
  • Circle ID
  • Domain Incite
  • Domain Name News
  • Domain Name Wire
  • Jason Thompson
  • Nigel Roberts

Blogs

  • Domain Gang
  • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Copyright © 2023 InternetNews.me