• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Domain Industry & Internet News

Domain Industry & Internet News

Domain Name Industry News

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submit News
  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise Hosting & Domain Industry Jobs
You are here: Home / icann / ICA Asks ICANN to Block PIR Sale

ICA Asks ICANN to Block PIR Sale

November 18, 2019 by Michele Neylon

The sale of PIR (.org) which was announced last week has generated a LOT of interest. Both Kevin at DomainIncite and Andrew over at DomainNameWire have written extensively in the last few days digging into various aspects of the sale which I’d recommend you read.

The latest salvo comes from the Internet Commerce Association (ICA) who have written to ICANN’s Board demanding that they block the sale.

The letter (PDF) references various clauses in the PIR contract with ICANN to run .org and demands that ICANN not approve the change of control.

Some of the assertions in the letter are a little hyperbolic like the one below:

Crucial policy decisions that have billion-dollar ramifications and which affect the stability of the Internet must be the subject of robust Board involvement and not left to ICANN staff

Being bluntly honest about it, the likelihood of ICANN’s Board paying much attention to this demand is pretty slim. It’d be opening Pandora’s box for ICANN to start getting involved in these kind of sales. Bear in mind the transaction is the sale of PIR as an entity and not the reassignment or sale of the .org contract.

The ICANN Board isn’t going to get involved in contract negotiations like the .org contract renewal and while some people might be worried about price increases in .org that is not going to impact the stability of the internet.

If ICANN were to get embroiled in every change of control type scenario then things would get incredibly messy and it really wouldn’t be doing anyone any favours.

Filed Under: icann, pir Tagged With: ICANN Board, pir

About Michele Neylon

Michele is founder and managing director of Irish domain registrar and hosting company Blacknight. Michele has been deeply involved in domain and internet policy discussions for more than a decade.
He also co-hosts the Technology.ie podcast.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Zak Muscovitch says

    November 18, 2019 at 6:22 pm

    Michele, thanks for covering this important issue.

    You stated, “Bear in mind the transaction is the sale of PIR as an entity and not the reassignment or sale of the .org contract.” The fact is that the .Org Registry Agreement specifically and expressly deems any “change of control” to be an “assignment”. The “change of control” clause was included in Section 7.5 for a reason; to enable ICANN to withhold consent if the “change of control: would result in an unacceptable material change of circumstances.

    You also stated< "Being bluntly honest about it, the likelihood of ICANN’s Board paying much attention to this demand is pretty slim. It’d be opening Pandora’s box for ICANN to start getting involved in these kind of sales." What do you mean by "these types of sales?". When's the last time that the unique .org registry, home of nonprofits, was sold off to a private equity firm immediately after long standing price caps were removed? This isn't like Donuts selling a new gTLD registry to Radix. This is a private equity firm taking over a cherished legacy TLD that until recently, had secure and stable price enshrined its its contract for the benefit of nonprofits.

    You also stated, "If ICANN were to get embroiled in every change of control type scenario then things would get incredibly messy and it really wouldn’t be doing anyone any favours."

    Nobody is asking ICANN to withhold approval of selling a new commercial registry from Company A to Company B or to get involved in every such transaction. Rather, this is a unique and heretofore unheard of circumstance, that many view as outrageous. It should be the subject of vigorous debate and proactive oversight by the ICANN Board, who should be acting in the public's best interests, not rubber stamping such an unprecedented transaction.

    Lastly, you stated, "price increases in .org [are] not going to impact the stability of the internet." Ask the 10 million .org registrants, many of which are nonprofits if unrestrained pricing makes the Internet more or less stable for them. Until recently, the .org Registry Agreement afforded registrants stable pricing through price caps. Many people, nonprofits in particular, fail to see how unrestrained pricing makes things better or more stable for .org registrants.

    • Michele Neylon says

      November 19, 2019 at 11:01 am

      Zak
      We aren’t going to agree on this.
      You are trying to use certain terms in order to provoke a visceral reaction from ICANN and ICANN observers.
      Pricing is not a security and stability issue.
      For the average small business or not for profit the price of a domain name increasing by a few percent is not going to have any tangible impact on their day to day operations. The retail price of a .org domain name is currently between $10 and $30 a year. An entry level hosting plan for a very small organisation is going to cost at least double that and many of the larger non-profits would have substantially bigger IT requirements than could be satisfied with hosting services in the sub $100 range.
      Sure, if the retail price of a .org domain name were to jump into the range of 4 or 5 figures per annum then that would be an issue for a lot of organisations, but arguing against unrestrained pricing? Seriously? The Internet and the entire ecosystem has flourished due to its permissionless nature.

      Thanks for your comments

      Michele

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

ICANN’s Cancún Meeting Was Almost Normal

Middle East DNS Forum to be Held in Istanbul

Gandi Merges with TWS to Form “Your.Online”

Anguilla Offline due to Fibre Issue

IGF 2023 to be Held in Kyoto, Japan

Recent Comments

  • ICANN Gets First Female CEO on Centralnic Head Honcho Announces Immediate Retirement
  • Kieren McCarthy Elected to Nominet Board on Nominet Election Candidates 2022 Finally Announced
  • Michele Neylon on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • Gavin Brown on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • ICANN Heading to Hamburg (ICANN78) and Los Angeles (GDD) Plus Training For African Registries - Goldstein Report on ICANN Announces GDD Summit Dates & Location

Categories

Blogroll

  • Alex Bligh
  • Circle ID
  • Domain Incite
  • Domain Name News
  • Domain Name Wire
  • Jason Thompson

Blogs

  • Domain Gang
  • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Archives

Recent Comments

  • ICANN Gets First Female CEO on Centralnic Head Honcho Announces Immediate Retirement
  • Kieren McCarthy Elected to Nominet Board on Nominet Election Candidates 2022 Finally Announced
  • Michele Neylon on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • Gavin Brown on Nominet Taking RDAP Out of Beta
  • ICANN Heading to Hamburg (ICANN78) and Los Angeles (GDD) Plus Training For African Registries - Goldstein Report on ICANN Announces GDD Summit Dates & Location

Categories

Blogroll

  • Alex Bligh
  • Circle ID
  • Domain Incite
  • Domain Name News
  • Domain Name Wire
  • Jason Thompson
  • Nigel Roberts

Blogs

  • Domain Gang
  • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Copyright © 2023 InternetNews.me